AIRCHOR FOR FOUNDERS

Keep the software project understandable without becoming the operator of every technical system.

Airchor helps founders turn ideas, incomplete products and scattered decisions into one structured project, a reviewable plan and a visible path forward.

New ideaExisting product
  1. 01Project understanding
  2. 02Bounded plan
  3. 03Evidence review
  4. 04Continue
Two starting points converge into a founder decision path with explicit scope, evidence and continuation.

Speed is useful only when the project can still explain itself.

AI tools can produce screens and code quickly, but founders still have to decide what the product is, what should be built next, which assumptions are risky and whether reported progress is real.

Airchor is designed to preserve those decisions and connect them to the work, evidence and next action.

Foundation established

Start with a new idea or continue what already exists.

Describe a new product from its problem, users and intended outcome, or bring the context of an incomplete prototype or existing application. Both paths converge into one Project Model that can continue across planning, implementation and later releases.

Foundation established

PROJECT ORIGIN

Create from an idea

Source
Founder or product owner
Role
Problem, users, intended outcome and constraints

DURABLE PROJECT TRUTH

One Project Model

  • Accepted intent
  • Evidence
  • Decisions
  • Unknowns
  • Current state

Next actionOne continued development lifecycle

Foundation established

PROJECT ORIGIN

Import existing software

Source
Customer-controlled project sources
Role
Code context, screenshots, documents and decisions
Different intake questions preserve each project origin while both routes converge into one Project Model and one continued development lifecycle.

Known facts

Accepted and supported

Claims

Attributed, not silently accepted

Assumptions

Visible and reviewable

Missing information

Kept open

Risk

Qualified by evidence

SourceProvenance retainedReviewDecision visible
Project understanding distinguishes evidence-backed facts from attributed claims, assumptions, uncertainty and missing information.
Next-best actionPrepare a bounded implementationBased on current Project Model state
In active development

BUILD SPECIFICATION · VERSIONED

Approved scope for one Build

  1. 1Objective
  2. 2Scope and exclusions
  3. 3Acceptance criteria
  4. 4Constraints
  5. 5Evidence requirements
  6. 6Human approvals
  7. 7Provider boundary
The Build Specification turns a selected next action into a bounded, versioned and reviewable execution contract.
In active development
  1. AI agentPerform bounded approved workTask evidence
  2. HumanApprove, review or provide evidenceRecorded decision
  3. External systemPerform provider-controlled operationCorrelated result

Human confirmation, provider completion and independently verified completion remain separate states.

Non-automatable work stays visible, instructed, evidenced and resumable inside the same project workflow.
SourceScope and intentTestDeclared check resultLogExecution recordReviewHuman finding
On the roadmap

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION RECORD

Approved acceptance criteria

Method
Independent checks and review
Evidence
Linked, attributable records
Result
Passed, failed, incomplete or blocked
Limitations
Only the declared scope
Verifier
Separate verification path
Work evidence enters a separate verification boundary; the resulting conclusion remains linked to its exact criteria, evidence and limitations.
Foundation established

Separate facts, assumptions, decisions and missing information.

A founder should be able to see which claims are supported, which decisions remain open and which missing information could change scope, cost or delivery.

Airchor’s established foundation already makes readiness, confidence, evidence, risk, assumptions and missing information visible in structured project outputs. The Control Plane extends this into a durable project state.

In active development

Move from ambition to a Build Specification that can be reviewed.

The plan should define the intended outcome, scope, exclusions, acceptance criteria, dependencies, ownership and evidence required from the work.

Airchor is being designed to recommend the next-best action and turn approved work into a versioned Build Specification before execution begins.

In active development

Keep builders, agents, approvals and provider steps in one visible workflow.

A founder should not have to reconstruct progress from separate chats, developer updates and provider dashboards. Control Plane Work Items make the actor, current step, dependency and required decision visible.

When a human action or approval is required, the workflow should explain what to do, what not to change and what evidence is needed before work can resume.

On the roadmap

See the difference between work reported complete and a result ready to approve.

Airchor is designed to connect plans, task progress, changed files, tests, previews and approvals while keeping deeper technical detail optional.

Independent verification and Tested Preview are roadmap capabilities. They are intended to let a founder review the result and its evidence before approving a launch decision.

On the roadmap

Keep the project portable when the builder or provider changes.

Airchor’s product direction is built around customer-controlled code, repositories, domains, provider accounts, deployments and project assets. The Project Model preserves the decisions and evidence needed to continue with another developer, agency, model or provider.

NEXT STEP

Current availability

Airchor MVP v1.0 provides the live, invitation-based foundation for structured project creation, project assessment, visible uncertainty, planning, roadmaps and developer handoffs. The unified Control Plane is being introduced through the published development roadmap.