ABOUT AIRCHOR
Building the control layer around AI-assisted software development.
Airchor exists because faster implementation does not remove the need for project truth, responsible decisions, coordinated work, evidence and ownership.
- Structured project foundationFoundation established
- Persistent Project ModelIn active development
- Coordinated workIn active development
- Verified deliveryOn the roadmap
- Continued developmentOn the roadmap
Software development needs a durable project state above the tools that perform the work.
AI models, coding agents, repositories and deployment providers each contribute part of the lifecycle. Airchor is being built to connect them through one Project Model, visible Work Items and explicit delivery states.
The goal is not to replace every builder or provider. It is to make their work understandable, coordinated and reviewable.
The first foundation structured projects. The next programme coordinates the lifecycle.
MVP v1.0 established project creation, existing-project assessment, persistent workflow state, visible uncertainty and structured planning, roadmap and handoff outputs.
The Control Plane programme extends those foundations into sources, project truth, next actions, Work Items, Agent Tasks, evidence, verification, preview, launch and continued development.
Developed through explicit authority, evidence and gated implementation.
Foundation establishedAirchor is a Founder-led product programme. Product direction, architecture, roadmap, terminology and implementation are governed through approved authority documents, repository evidence, dry runs, validation and explicit release decisions.
Planned capability is not treated as live merely because it appears in a prototype, specification or roadmap.
Visitors should be able to tell what exists and what is being built.
Airchor uses clear states: Available now, Foundation established, In active development and On the roadmap. Long-term direction is identified separately.
This creates a more useful product story than either hiding the future or presenting it as already complete.
Project continuity should not depend on one agent or provider.
Airchor’s governing direction is customer control of code, repositories, provider accounts, domains, deployments and project assets. The Project Model should preserve project truth across changing tools, developers and operating stages.
Individual integrations and portability controls are described according to their actual roadmap state.
Automation does not remove approval, review or accountability.
People remain responsible for product decisions, account-owner actions, legal acceptance, risk decisions and release approval. Airchor is designed to make those responsibilities visible and to provide non-coder instructions when a human action is required.
Structured outputs, task states and verification evidence support judgement; they do not replace it.