Open Airchor

AIRCHOR FOR ADVISORS

Review the project without reconstructing it from disconnected sources.

Airchor brings project intent, evidence, decisions, uncertainty, work and next actions into one review surface for technical and product advisors.

Explore the Control PlaneContact Airchor
EvidenceAssumptionsRiskMissing information
REVIEW SUBJECTOne Project Model
Scope-qualified decisionNext responsible action
Evidence and uncertainty remain visible around the shared review subject before a decision or next action is accepted.

Advice is only as reliable as the project context behind it.

Advisors are often asked to judge direction, risk or delivery state from partial documents, demonstrations and verbal claims. Important assumptions and missing evidence may be invisible.

Airchor’s purpose is to make the basis of a decision inspectable without turning advisory output into a formal certification claim.

In active development

Review one accepted project state.

The Project Model is designed to organise product intent, requirements, decisions, evidence, plans, implementation state and release history. Provenance and change history help explain why the current state exists and what changed it.

Foundation established

Keep uncertainty visible rather than smoothing it away.

Facts, claims, assumptions, evidence strength, confidence, risk and missing information should remain distinguishable. A recommendation can then state both its conclusion and the limits of the available evidence.

The current product already establishes these concepts in advisory project outputs. The Control Plane extends them into the continuing project lifecycle.

Known facts

Accepted and supported

Claims

Attributed, not silently accepted

Assumptions

Visible and reviewable

Missing information

Kept open

Risk

Qualified by evidence

SourceProvenance retainedReviewDecision visible
Project understanding distinguishes evidence-backed facts from attributed claims, assumptions, uncertainty and missing information.
  1. 01

    Claim

    Attributed statement

  2. 02

    Source

    Provenance recorded

  3. 03

    Evidence

    Relevant artefact

  4. 04

    Check

    Criterion evaluated

  5. 05

    Conclusion

    Scope-qualified result

SourceProvenance visibleTestResult recorded
Evidence supports a check; neither an artefact nor a checkmark becomes a blanket verified conclusion by itself.

DECISION

What is the next responsible action?

Choices
Reduce uncertainty · Approve a bounded plan · Defer
Evidence
Attributable sources, assumptions, risk and missing information
Outcome
Scope-qualified recommendation
Owner
Responsible reviewer
Status
Review required
In active development
  1. AI agentPerform bounded approved workTask evidence
  2. HumanApprove, review or provide evidenceRecorded decision
  3. External systemPerform provider-controlled operationCorrelated result

Human confirmation, provider completion and independently verified completion remain separate states.

Non-automatable work stays visible, instructed, evidenced and resumable inside the same project workflow.
SourceScope and intentTestDeclared check resultLogExecution recordReviewHuman finding
On the roadmap

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION RECORD

Approved acceptance criteria

Method
Independent checks and review
Evidence
Linked, attributable records
Result
Passed, failed, incomplete or blocked
Limitations
Only the declared scope
Verifier
Separate verification path
Work evidence enters a separate verification boundary; the resulting conclusion remains linked to its exact criteria, evidence and limitations.
In active development

Connect review findings to a bounded path forward.

A useful advisory outcome identifies the decision, its rationale, the evidence that supports it and the next action that reduces uncertainty or advances the project.

Airchor is being designed to preserve those decisions and translate an approved next action into a plan or Build Specification.

In active development

See where delivery is waiting and why.

Control Plane Work Items make agent work, human actions, approvals, reviews, evidence requests and external dependencies visible in one workflow. This helps an advisor distinguish a technical blocker from an unresolved business decision or an unverified completion claim.

On the roadmap

Structured evidence supports judgement; it does not replace it.

Airchor does not present its current outputs as formal technical due diligence, certification, a security audit or independent professional advice. Reviewers remain responsible for the scope, evidence and conclusions they accept.

Independent verification is a roadmap capability with explicit scope, not a blanket readiness guarantee.

NEXT STEP

Next step

Explore the Control PlaneContact Airchor