PLAN. ORCHESTRATE. BUILD.

The control plane for AI-assisted software development.

Bring ideas, software, evidence, and decisions into one Project Model. Airchor is building the agentic orchestration layer for software development—turning project direction into coordinated, verifiable execution.

MVP v1.0 provides the live foundation. The unified Control Plane is in active development.

Origin 01Create from an ideaProblem · users · outcome · constraints
Origin 02Import existing softwareCode · evidence · decisions · open issues
In active development

DURABLE PROJECT TRUTH

One Project Model

  • Intent
  • Sources
  • Decisions
  • Risk
  • Evidence
  • Next action

Next actionReview a bounded plan

  1. 01Ask
  2. 02Plan
  3. 03Execute
  4. 04Verify
AgentsHumansExternal systemsEvidence
Two ways of starting a project feed one Project Model, which coordinates planning, work, evidence, verification and continued development.

THE MISSING CONTROL LAYER

Faster code does not automatically create a controlled software project.

AI can accelerate implementation, but the project still has to carry its intent, decisions, constraints, evidence and ownership across many tools and people. Chat histories fragment. Assumptions become invisible. Agents report progress in different ways. Human approvals and provider-console steps disappear outside the workflow.

The result is often more output without a reliable project state. Airchor is being built to keep the complete development lifecycle understandable and coordinated around one source of project truth.

Chat historiesDocumentsCodeDecisionsTestsProvidersOne reliable project state is missing.
In active development

ONE SYSTEM, TWO ORIGINS

Start from an idea or bring existing software. Both become one project.

A new product may begin with a problem, a brief and a set of goals. An existing project may arrive with code, screenshots, documents, decisions, unresolved bugs and conflicting claims.

Airchor treats these as different origins, not separate long-term products. The sources converge into one Project Model that records what is known, what remains uncertain, what has been decided and what should happen next.

Foundation established

PROJECT ORIGIN

Create from an idea

Source
Founder or product owner
Role
Problem, users, intended outcome and constraints

DURABLE PROJECT TRUTH

One Project Model

  • Accepted intent
  • Evidence
  • Decisions
  • Unknowns
  • Current state

Next actionOne continued development lifecycle

Foundation established

PROJECT ORIGIN

Import existing software

Source
Customer-controlled project sources
Role
Code context, screenshots, documents and decisions
Different intake questions preserve each project origin while both routes converge into one Project Model and one continued development lifecycle.

A CONTROLLED PATH FORWARD

Understand. Plan. Execute. Verify.

Understand
Organise sources, evidence, decisions, assumptions, risk and missing information into a usable project state.
Plan
Turn that state into priorities, a bounded next action and a reviewable Build Specification.
Execute
Coordinate permitted work through visible tasks, clear actors, approvals and controls.
Verify
Compare results with acceptance criteria and evidence before progress is treated as complete.
ONEProject Model
  1. 01Foundation established

    Ask

    Read the Project Model and evidence.

  2. 02In active development

    Plan

    Create a bounded approach.

  3. 03On the roadmap

    Execute

    Coordinate approved Work Items.

  4. 04On the roadmap

    Verify

    Evaluate evidence against criteria.

Ask reads, Plan proposes, Execute performs eligible bounded work and Verify independently checks results. The four intents do not share one completion state.

Planning, execution and verification remain distinct so that a generated result, a completed task and an accepted delivery are never treated as the same state.

WHO AIRCHOR IS FOR

One Control Plane. Different decision boundaries.

Foundation

Founders

Carry a defined problem, scope, assumptions, and acceptance criteria from project foundation toward governed implementation.

Explore route

Assessment

Agencies

Move from supplied client evidence and bounded findings toward a reviewable recovery direction and future governed repair.

Explore route

Decision

Advisors

Keep evidence, uncertainty, options, risk, and the owner’s next decision visible around future execution.

Explore route

Context

AI Builders

Turn fragmented prompts and fast-moving implementation context into durable project state and controlled agent work.

Explore route

Boundary

Freelancers

Define a responsible scope, explicit exclusions, acceptance criteria, and review points before another sprint.

Explore route

Gate

Agency Project Assessment

Create a deliberate evidence and decision gate before estimating or committing to implementation.

Explore route
In active development

WORK THAT STAYS VISIBLE

AI agents, humans and external systems belong in the same workflow.

Every meaningful step can be represented as a Control Plane Work Item. Some Work Items may be performed by an AI agent. Others require a Founder, reviewer, approver, developer or external provider.

Airchor is designed to show the responsible actor, automation level, current step, dependencies, evidence and next required action. Work that cannot be automated should still be instructed, tracked, verified where possible and resumed without losing the project context.

Automate what can be automated. Orchestrate what cannot.

In active development

CONTROL PLANE WORK ITEM

Deliver one approved change

Scope
One bounded result
Coordinator
Airchor Control Plane
State
Waiting for coordinated work
Dependency
Approved Build Specification
Evidence
Task, human and provider records
Next action
Verify the complete result

AGENT TASK · SPECIALISED EXECUTION OBJECT

Implement the approved technical scope

State
Awaiting verification
Current step
Evidence handoff
Completed
Plan followed · Change reported
Pending
Independent verification
Evidence
Changed files and command results
Human action

Review the exact result

Actor
Reviewer
Mode
Assisted
Instruction
Compare the result with the approved scope.
Evidence
Recorded review decision
Resumes
Verification and Preview path

EXTERNAL-SYSTEM STEP

External provider

Responsible actor
External provider
Required input
Exact approved operation
Returned evidence
Correlated provider result
State
Waiting
Boundary
Outside Airchor execution
A Work Item is the parent coordination envelope. Agent Tasks and their execution records remain distinct from human actions, external operations and verification.
On the roadmap

TRUTHFUL PROGRESS

“Done” becomes a sequence of clear, reviewable states.

An agent stopping is not the same as a task being verified. Checks passing is not the same as a Tested Preview being ready. A preview being ready is not the same as user approval or Production launch.

Airchor is being designed to keep these states separate and visible. Plans, changed files, commands, tests, previews, approvals and release evidence should support the claim being made, while deeper technical detail remains available when it is needed.

  1. 01

    Claim

    Attributed statement

  2. 02

    Source

    Provenance recorded

  3. 03

    Evidence

    Relevant artefact

  4. 04

    Check

    Criterion evaluated

  5. 05

    Conclusion

    Scope-qualified result

SourceProvenance visibleTestResult recorded
Evidence supports a check; neither an artefact nor a checkmark becomes a blanket verified conclusion by itself.
SourceScope and intentTestDeclared check resultLogExecution recordReviewHuman finding
On the roadmap

INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION RECORD

Approved acceptance criteria

Method
Independent checks and review
Evidence
Linked, attributable records
Result
Passed, failed, incomplete or blocked
Limitations
Only the declared scope
Verifier
Separate verification path
Work evidence enters a separate verification boundary; the resulting conclusion remains linked to its exact criteria, evidence and limitations.
Governing product direction

BUILT FOR CONTINUITY

The project should survive changing tools, agents and providers.

Airchor is designed around customer control of code, repositories, provider accounts, domains, deployments and project assets. The Project Model should preserve intent, decisions and evidence even when a model changes, an agency hands over the work or development pauses and resumes later.

Provider neutrality is a governing direction rather than a claim that every integration is available today. The roadmap defines when each connection and execution path becomes part of the product.

Governing product direction

CUSTOMER-CONTROLLED FOUNDATIONS

  • Code
  • Repositories
  • Provider accounts
  • Domains
  • Deployments
  • Project assets

CUSTOMER-CONTROLLED FOUNDATION

Project continuity

Custodian
Customer
Provider category
Generic, replaceable connections
Portability direction
Designed to preserve project truth across tools
Airchor boundary
Airchor coordinates; individual integrations follow the roadmap
Model providerRepository providerDeployment provider
Airchor is being designed around customer control and provider-neutral coordination. The scene does not imply that every integration is currently available.

FROM FOUNDATION TO CONTROL PLANE

A clear progression, without presenting the future as live.

  1. 01Foundation established

    Foundation established

    The invitation-based MVP structures new and existing projects, preserves workflow state, makes uncertainty visible and creates planning, roadmap and handoff outputs.

  2. 02In active development

    Control Plane foundation

    The active programme introduces the unified Project Model, Source Inbox, next-best action, Build Specifications, Work Items and visible task coordination.

  3. 03On the roadmap

    Coordinated execution

    Planned capabilities connect bounded agent, human and external-system work through permissions, approvals and evidence.

  4. 04On the roadmap

    Verified delivery

    Independent checks, Tested Preview and explicit review create a trustworthy boundary before launch.

  5. 05On the roadmap

    Launch and Continue

    Approved releases and post-launch evidence update the same Project Model so that the next cycle begins with current project truth.

The progression is capability-based and publishes no dates or decorative completion percentages.

CHOOSE YOUR NEXT STEP

Explore the system, follow its progress or request access.

See how the complete Control Plane is designed to work, review what is available and what is being built, or contact Airchor about invitation-based access.

INVITATION-BASED ACCESS

Request access to the current Airchor foundation

The current application is available by invitation. Tell us who you are, what stage your software project is in and why you are interested in Airchor. Do not send credentials, private source code, repository archives, raw Production logs or confidential client information.

Submitting a request does not create an account or guarantee immediate access. Existing invited users can sign in or open the application directly.

PRODUCT UPDATES

Follow the Control Plane programme

Receive occasional updates about the Airchor product, Control Plane development and major website or release milestones.

Product Updates use email confirmation through double opt-in. Subscribing does not create an Airchor account or grant application access.

Signup uses double opt-in. Airchor does not store your email in a local website database. Read the Privacy Policy.